↓
 

University of Leeds UCU
  • Home
  • Join UCU
  • My UCU
  • Support
  • About Us
    • Joining
    • Contact Us
    • Committee members 2019-2020
    • Department representatives
    • Calendar
    • Local rules
    • Standing for election to the UCU committee
    • Useful resources and agreements
    • Other campus unions
    • Dashboard
    • Mobile Dashboard
  • Campaigns
    • Anti-casualisation
    • Gender pay gap
    • Pensions
    • Casualisation, equal pay, workload and fair pay negotiations
    • Workloads
    • Migrant members
  • Calendar
join today online or by phone 0333 207 0719

Other campus unions

  • Unite: National web site
  • UNISON: National web site, HE section and University of Leeds Unison Branch
  • NUS: National Union of Students and Leeds University Union
  • TUC Web site

Dispute information

Posted on 5 December 2019 by Alan Smith5 December 2019
image of large strike rally on Parkinson Building steps

Everything you need to know from from UCU nationally

Advice and information about the strikes, including detailed advice for migrant members with a visa

Local information

Reporting strike action, and guidance on action short of a strike

Updated details on the local hardship fund, after members voted to increase the support available at general meeting 3 December

(Link to key information posted in advance of the strike, for reference)

Posted in Dispute advice

Reporting strike action, and guidance on Action Short of a Strike

Posted on 4 December 2019 by editor14 December 2019

Reporting strike action

On Thursday 5th December, or on your first day back if you don’t work Thursdays, you should report that you took strike action, via ESS or by email to industrialaction@leeds.ac.uk, as set out in the email from HR on 18th November. You should also report that you are taking ASOS.

If you are on a visa, it’s extra important that you are recorded as having been on strike, otherwise it could count as unauthorised absence which could affect your visa – you might like to report by email and ask for confirmation that your report has been recorded.

Guidance on ASOS

We will be doing the ASOS which was set out in the voting papers for the ballot, and which you voted overwhelmingly for. We are asking you to:

  • work to contract
  • not cover for absent colleagues
  • not reschedule lectures or classes cancelled due to strike action
  • not undertake any voluntary activities

Your committee, with the help of the packed General Meeting on 3 December, has put together the a document containing local ASOS guidance, available here: www.leedsucu.org.uk/asos-guidance-from-leeds-ucu/ Also see the national FAQ at www.ucu.org.uk/he-action-faqs

Note in particular that our university management have softened their approach compared to 2018 – they are asking teaching staff to “recover learning” not “reschedule teaching”. We have suggested in the attached document how you should respond to requests for plans on how to recover teaching on your first day back, and ideas for how you might do the recovering. Some local managers are asking staff to reschedule lost teaching – do not do this, because that would be breaking ASOS. Our ASOS guidance document also has guidance for researchers and academic related staff. It has been great to have some Heads of School and other senior staff on the picket lines with us and on strike with us – we recognise they will be in a difficult position, and the document includes some guidance for these members too.

Our ASOS guidance document also includes suggested wording about ASOS to append to your email signature.

Posted in Dispute, Dispute advice, Dispute information

Local Hardship Fund

Posted on 3 December 2019 by Jonathan Saha3 December 2019

At our General Meeting on 3 December we unanimously passed a motion revising the rules for our local Hardship Fund to allow us to provide greater support to members facing financial difficulties due to pay deductions for striking. The local Hardship Fund will work alongside and in addition to the UK-wide Fighting Fund. Members should apply to the Fighting Fund for support initially, except where claiming for days of strike action not covered by the Fighting Fund (day 1 for those earning less than £30,000 gross annually, days 1 and 2 for those earning more than £30,000 gross annually). The local Hardship Fund will the supplement the UK-wide Fighting Fund, or provide support where the UK-wide Fighting Fund cannot. The new rules mean that the Hardship Fund:

  1. Will comply with the appended guidance from UCU to ensure continued solvency of the branch, and that the branch is able to continue to meet all its usual commitments for and on behalf of members;
  2. Will be managed by local branch officers a panel of at least three elected branch officers, including the Treasurer;
  3. Will prioritise members in precarious, low paid work, as per national and local priorities;
  4. Will also prioritise members who can demonstrate that their contractual and/or financial status means that they would be disproportionately impacted by strike deductions;
  5. Will limit the amount that can be claimed by a member to no more than would have otherwise been earned;
  6. Will cap the amount that can be claimed by a member per day to £75, except for the first day of the strike action when the cap will be £150, so long as this is not more than would have otherwise been earned;
  7. Will cap the total amount that can be claimed by a member during the disputes to £1000, so long as this is not more than would otherwise been earned;
  8. Will initially prioritise support in the days 1-2 of the strike (or pro rata equivalent), and subsequently will seek to complement support provided by the National Fighting Fund according to the principles of those most in need first, as outlined above;
  9. Will, where funds allow, seek to support members suffering disproportionate impact from any further deductions made in connection with industrial action (e.g. ASOS) subject to the same principles of prioritisation outlined above;
  10. Will, once the USS pension and the “Four Fights” disputes are over, allow unused funds that originated from the University of Leeds UCU main operational account remaining in the Local Hardship fund to be either transferred back into the branch’s operational funds, retained in the Local Hardship Fund, or sent to the National Fighting Fund.

The full motion can be downloaded here: http://www.leedsucu.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/Motion-Revising-Terms-of-Leeds-UCU-Local-Hardship-Fund.docx

The application form for making a claim to the local Hardship Fund can be downloaded here: http://www.leedsucu.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/UCU-local-hardship-claim-form-JANUARY.docx

There will be drop-ins to help members to complete the application form organised over the coming weeks.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged Disputes, Hardship Fund

Two responses to the recent Gryphon editorial on our strike

Posted on 3 December 2019 by admin3 December 2019

From the picket lines this week, two committee members offered polite responses to an editorial in the Gryphon newspaper that addressed the causes of the current industrial action. Dr Laura Loyola-Hernández offered a response covering the chief aspect of the aspect: the four fights. Dr Mark Taylor-Batty offered one on the issue of USS. We reproduce them both here.

Four fights:

A letter to my students

casualidad staff

On Monday we were meant to learn about feminist decolonial research but instead I will be striking. I would love nothing more than to be teaching you. I did not come to this decision lightly. I haven’t come across anyone striking that is not worried about their students, specially those that are in vulnerable positions. But as we have heard across picket lines nationwide: our working conditions are your learning conditions.

I write this as a response to the editorial letter in the latest edition of The Gryphon. I find in the arguments a reflection of wider debates happening on the picket line. Many of the conversations have concentrated around pensions. Yes, we are trying to fight to save our pension scheme but this is only one of two disputes. The second is about FOUR connected fights. The strike is also about unsustainable workloads, gender and racial pay gaps, and casualisation. These topics are often marginalised in the debates surrounding the current strikes but are an essential component of the structural inequalities in the education system. More importantly, the people that have often raised these concerns are usually the most vulnerable: PGR students and academic and non-academic staff on hourly paid and fixed term contracts.

According to UCU statistics, the average university employee works 50 hours a week. This does not include the unpaid emotional labour that many womxn, especially Black and Womxn of Colour, do to support vulnerable students and Early career colleagues. Similarly, our efforts to decolonise practices within the university and the curriculum and our fight to tackle institutional racism often go unrecognised. All of this happens while being paid less than white colleagues.

Staff pay has fallen by around 20% in real terms over the past decade. These numbers are worse for womxn, especially Black and WOC. Last year a report from the BBC showed that 86% of staff in Russell Group Universities are white, with only 1% Black. The report also demonstrated that while white women are paid 15% less than a white man, Black and Asian women are paid 39% and 22% less than a white man (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/education-46473269). The statistics are dire. There are only 26 Black women professors in the UK and: “over a three year period just 1.2% of the 19,868 studentships awarded by all UKRI research councils went to Black or Black Mixed students and only 30 of those were from Black Caribbeanbackground” (https://leadingroutes.org/the-broken-pipeline).

According to the University of Leeds gender pay gap report (https://equality.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2019/11/J000449_Gender- Pay-Gap-Report-2019_Final-Published.pdf), there is an 18.9% gender pay gap in our institution. Despite knowing that 73% of Leeds staff is white (https://equality.leeds.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/sites/64/2019/01/All_Staff_in- post_2018.pdf), there are no formal statistics with regards to the extent of the racial pay gap in our institution. These structural inequalities are also reflected in our student body. Only 17.6% of home/EU students are BME while there is a 12% BME attainment gap. We must understand these numbers not as the cause of inequality but as symptoms of sexism, institutional racism and misogynoir in our universities.

Casualisation is pervasive in our sector with 49% of teaching-only academics and 67% of research-only staff on fixed term contracts. Forty-nine universities still use widely discredited zero-hours contracts for academic staff. According to a recent report by UCU, part time and hourly paid teachers are doing 45% of their work without pay, 71% said that their mental health had been damaged by working on insecure contracts (https://www.ucu.org.uk/media/10336/Counting-the-costs-of- casualisation-in-higher-education-Jun- 19/pdf/ucu_casualisation_in_HE_survey_report_Jun19.pdf).

What about Leeds University? Our institution employs 65% of its research staff and 36% of its teaching only staff on fixed-term contracts, as well as employing 1,343 academics as atypical workers (http://www.leedsucu.org.uk/wp- content/uploads/2019/01/University-of-Leeds-UCU-AntiCas-Claim-Jan-2019.pdf). Many of them are postgraduate students working as teaching assistants and employed as temporary casual workers. They have limited or no sick pay, holiday pay and other employment benefits. How are we to support our students and their mental health when ours is broken?

Workload, gender and racial pay gap and casualisation affect our pension scheme. If we are paid less while we are working, we will receive less while in retirement. Unhealthy workloads, sexism and institutional racism tend to push out Black and POC out of the sector, particularly womxn and non-binary people.

I am a WOC immigrant on a fixed term contract. Many migrant UCU members are striking knowing that we might not be in this country in six months or in one or two years because of draconian immigration policies (Hostile Environment), precarious employment and pay gaps. We are striking with genuine fear of the Home Office. We are also striking for eight days without pay. We have asked that lost pay be given to the Student Hardship fund and support of student mental health. We are striking because we believe that a better university is possible for students and staff.

I am striking for migrant students who can’t and whose immigration status is being weaponised to break the strike. I’m striking for students who do not feel heard, seen, that have been invisibilised and made to suffer because of their race, gender, immigration status, religion, sexuality, mental health, disability and chronic illness. I am striking for those who have not felt heard and supported by our union. I can only continue to push for change both within UCU and our universities. And yes, I also strike for those who can and choose not to. I believe in the power of collective action. I’m striking for the ones coming behind me, for the future generations because our working conditions are your learning conditions.

USS:

A pension-focussed response to the @TheGryphonLeeds editorial, politely to offer some granularity and fact-checking to the soundbites.

Pensions are dull as dishwater, and complex in structure. But in recent years, they have fired up staff, because of the needless damage that employers have sought to visit upon them. Last year’s 14 days of strikes specifically concerned defending our pensions, and that dispute was put on hold with the forming of a Joint Expert Panel. It is true that UUK institutions broadly welcomed the setting up of the JEP, and then its recommendations. However, all but a couple of those recommendations have now been applied to the valuation, and it is a fact that UUK has done little to nothing to urge USS to apply all those recommendations, which were approved by both their and UCU’s auditors and actuaries. We know that if those recommendations could have been applied to the 2018 valuation, then we would already be in a position of ‘no detriment’ and there would be no dispute in that corner. It was this ‘bait and switch’ behaviour that led us to the current situation, and pensions being one of the disputes this year. 

There has been plenty of discussion of the UUK proposal to increase our contributions to 9.1%, but it has been clear that the purpose of the late-in-the-day 9.1% ‘offer’ was to fabricate an illusion of the employers being reasonable, which only those not properly paying attention could really be convinced by. The reality was that we had already seen a historic 10% rise in their contributions from 8% to 8.8% earlier this year, for no extra gain. Crucially, we should also recall that the employers gave themselves a ‘contribution holiday’ by lowering their contributions by 4% from 1997 to 2009. Had they not done so, there would never have been any ‘deficit’, however badly it is calculated. What is more, their own actuaries indicated in responses to USS that they could afford the kinds of increases that would cover these losses which their contribution holidays were instrumental in constructing. Employers in the post-92 sector are already paying the kinds of contributions (to the TPA pension) that our more established universities are arguing are ‘unaffordable’. There is little mention of these facts in reporting around this issue, sadly.

Let’s look at the valuation, from which the notion of our pension being in ‘deficit’ arises. The current value of the pension pot is £68.5 billion. Under £3 billion each year goes to pensioners and all other scheme costs. More than that £3b amount actually comes in annually from contributions – what we and the employers pay in each year has pretty much always more than covered what needs to go out of the scheme. So, the now £68.5 billion remains untouched, year after year, and just keeps growing in value (and the net returns on investments also more than covers what goes out). This has been the situation for decades.
Now, there is a regulatory requirement to consider what would happen if a business goes bust, and that is as it should be, but in this situation that means applying a single-employer regulation to a multi-employer scheme. The ‘deficit/surplus’ is simply a calculation of whether there will be enough money in the future to pay all pensions if Universities start going bust. You can calculate a ‘deficit’ in twenty years’ time if, for example, you assume wage growth way beyond that you are actually willing ever to concede, and if you insist on selling high yielding stocks and replacing them with low-yielding bonds (so-called ‘de-risking’) (stop yawning at the back). Yes, there is important talk of the the Pension Regulator, who are currently investigating behaviour in the scheme, but they absolutely do not require USS to calculate the ‘deficit’ in the way that that do. 

When Universities pushed to shift our pensions scheme away from a ‘final salary’ scheme earlier this decade, people of my generation saw a drop in the value of their pensions of tens, even hundreds of thousands of pounds over the course of their future retirement. The employers used to argue that if we didn’t get inflation-beating pay rises, that we at least had a strong pension waiting for us. That argument unsurprisingly and noticeably has evaporated in recent years. The concerted shift to push to switch us to ‘defined contribution’ pensions last year (that is, a pension in which all we know is how much money goes in, not at all what comes out) caused that dispute, and that threat is still very much in the balance now if we fail to hold ground this year. This will have disproportionate impact on the pensions of younger members of staff. None of this was necessary, and the blame and onus to correct is on the employers. Thanks for your time reading this. 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged uss

What’s on at today’s Teach Out – Tuesday 3 December

Posted on 3 December 2019 by editor12 December 2019

Full teach out programme is here

Strike Data Hack Workshop

Helen Thornham, Chris Birchall, Joanne Armitage

This is a practical data hack workshop where we will scrape, analyse and visualise the data and discourses of the strike. ideally would run as 2 or 3 50 minute slots – or as an additional event.No experience necessary! Just bring a laptop and your extension cable to make sure the battery doesn’t run out! We will teach some basics to scraping and coding, data visualisations and analysis and critically interrogate how the strike actions and pension dispute have been presented. Perhaps we could look at the language used across national media, the statistics used to defend positions, or the longer data histories of the pension dispute. We could look at university policy documents, VC letters across universities, or union publicity for example.

1pm – 3pm, Quaker Meeting House

Jews in the Medieval Imaginary

Eva Frojmovic

1pm – 3pm, Leeds Central Library, Art Library

The state of PGTAs at Leeds: discussion and fact-finding

UCU committee

1pm – 2pm, Quaker Meeting House

Fleabag: Sex, Confession, and the Camera

Carl White

2pm – 3pm, Quaker Meeting House

Strike pay surgery

UCU committee

1 pm onwards, Quaker Meeting House

Support with filling in forms to claim from the national Fighting Fund and the local Hardship Fund. (NB Claims can’t actually be submitted till you have proof of the pay lost by striking).

Street Theatre Performance!

Masters students @PCI_UniofLeeds perform their street theatre play, Students Strike Back!, in support of #UCUstrikes on Woodhouse Lane. Various times from 10 a.m.

Posted in Open meetings and events
USS pension justice. We demand it. Image of two raised fists, blue and white, pink background.
Four Fights One Voice. Pay inequality, job insecurity, rising workloads, pay deflation
Four years free membership for research students who teach
Sexual harassment helpline 0800 138 8724

Campaign updates

  • Anti-casualisation
  • Workloads
  • Pensions
  • Gender pay gap
  • UCU national website

Latest updates

  • Dispute information
  • Reporting strike action, and guidance on Action Short of a Strike
  • Local Hardship Fund
  • Two responses to the recent Gryphon editorial on our strike
  • What’s on at today’s Teach Out – Tuesday 3 December

Updates by subject

  • Campaigns
    • Anticasualisation
    • Equality
      • Black members / BME
      • Disability
      • Gender equality
      • Gender pay gap
      • LGBT+
      • Mental health
      • Migrant members
    • Government
    • HE green paper
    • Opposing privatisation
    • Pay
    • Pensions
    • Postgraduate
    • Prevent
    • Safety and health
    • University operational issues
    • Wider campaigning
      • Brexit
      • Environment
      • Migration and refugees
    • Workload
  • Consultations and negotiations
    • Car parking
    • Feedback
    • IT
    • Recruitment
    • REF
    • Statutes
  • Dispute
    • Dispute advice
  • Joining UCU
  • Local Association
    • Administration
    • Dispute information
    • Elections
    • General Meetings
    • Getting involved
    • Members emails
    • Minutes
    • Newsletter
    • Open meetings and events
    • Solidarity
  • Support
    • Sexual harassment
  • UCU democracy
  • Uncategorized
  • University Democracy
  • Website archive
    • University of the Year

Search this site

Follow @leedsucu
find us on Facebook
Four years' free membership for postgraduate research students who teach
Four years' free membership for research students who teach - join the academic trade union
Four years' free membership for research students who teach - join the academic trade union

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
©2019 - - Weaver Xtreme Theme
↑