This page will present information and links concerning the dispute over the future of USS (Universities Superannuation Scheme) pensions. The latest updates from the local branch committee on the USS pensions dispute are available below, in chronological order with the most recent first.  We have provided an ‘ABC of USS’ here to offer a plain English account of the jargon that you will hear and read in relation to USS.

Where things stand: 2021

Summer 2021: As we move toward the implementation of increases to our pension contributions in October 2021, the possibility of industrial action looms. On 3 August, Oxford and Cambridge Universities and their associated UCU branches jointly put out a call for serious consideration of Conditional Indexation as a solution to the current dispute. UCU are also considering legal action and a letter in advance of litigation was sent to USS early in August.

April/May 2021: UUK undertook a consultation of its members concerning their response to the implications in the most recent valuation that contributions should increase. Members were surveyed over two solutions a.) benefit reform that will imply a 21% reduction in pensions, a shrinking of the DB part of the scheme, and a inflation cap on the value of your pension growing in value before retirement. b.) an alternative scheme for low paid staff that will be defined contribution only. You can read more details in this briefing. This consultation closed at 5pm on 7 May. At Leeds, the UCU held a parallel survey, the results of which indicated a broad intentes in conditional indexation, and a desire also to fight to retain pensions at current levels or contribution and benefit.

May 2021: UUK consulted their members on whether they would support changes to USS’s governance structures. UCU have supported the proposals made by the JEP for governance change.

In February 2021, UCU negotiator Sam Marsh released a series of videos explaining the flaw in the current valuation and demonstrating how badly wrong all previous valuations had been: A reality check, Prudence in the 2020 USS valuation, and An explanation of prudence discrepancies in the 2020 USS valuation.

In September 2020, the USS began consulting with employers on the ‘technical provisions’ (the theoretical size of the pension promises accrued). UCU expressed we had no confidence in the ‘needlessly cautious’ approach taken by the Universities Superannuation Scheme (USS) in its valuation of the pension scheme.

We called off our strike in 2018 on the promise of a Joint Expert Panel (JEP) being established to look at how the pension scheme operated. The JEP made seven recommendations, and both the employers and the UCU accepted these recommendations. Once implemented, these would imply a total contribution rate of 26% for both employers and employees, allowing members’ contributions to return to the 8% rate. The USS refused to implement these recommendations, and has offered no clear explanation why they will not. When USS tried to imply that the Pensions Regulator used a specific manner of measuring the strength of the Universities’ covenant (their ability to pay long-term), the Regulator publicly refuted this claim. 

The current UCU position is still one of no detriment – our contributions rates should not rise, and our benefits in retirement should not go down. We argue that if further contributions have to be made, then the employers should foot the bill. 

The UCU’s Supperannuation Working Group (SWG) is exploring a solution to impasse that might be offered in Conditional Indexation of benefits. Details will be posted if this becomes firm UCU policy. CI is described in brief on our ABC of USS page.

Links to UCU policy and further commentary

Latest branch news on pensions

As pensions are negotiated nationally, most pensions updates will be from the union nationally.

This page was last updated on 12 August 2021