Challenging the terms of debate
Motion to the general meeting 25 October 2017
This conference believes that
- USS reports on the basis of its real assets: a surplus of £5bn.
- The reporting of a deficit is a recklessly prudent artificial construct ideologically driven by changes in accounting reporting regulation.
- Constructing deficits has provided an ideological justification for the privatisation of collective Defined Benefit pension schemes and movement into individual Defined Contribution pension schemes.
This conference resolves
- To reaffirm that UCU does not accept the methodology that creates the ‘gilts plus’ deficit.
- To state publicly in our literature we do not believe there to be a deficit and not to seek additional contributions from employers to pay for the constructed deficit.
- To refuse to accept detrimental changes to the USS pension scheme.
Proposed by the committee
This page was last updated on 22 October 2017

